I noticed that ieee754fpu doesn't have any licenses, we need to ensure that all our source ends up with a license or at least a comment directing to the file with the license. We should try to include SPDX license headers for machine readability. Example: https://salsa.debian.org/Kazan-team/kazan/blob/master/Cargo.toml https://salsa.debian.org/Kazan-team/kazan/blob/master/Notices.txt License status key: ? -- unknown Y -- properly licensed N -- not properly licensed Repository check list (edit to keep updated): git.libre-riscv.org: ? crowdsupply.git ? freedom-sifive.git N ieee754fpu.git ? libreriscv.git ? pinmux.git Y riscv-isa-sim.git ? riscv-tests.git Y rv32.git ? shakti-core.git ? shakti-iclass.git ? shakti-peripherals.git ? sifive-blocks.git ? soc.git ? sv2nmigen.git Kazan-team on Debian Salsa: Y algebraics Y nmigen-type-annotations Y simple-barrel-processor Y softfloat-verify Y softfloat-sys Y kazan
yehyeh, it's basically (implicitly) the license that jon dawson wrote, for some stuff, and i just haven't been focussing on it. the bugreport's a good idea.