http://lists.libre-soc.org/pipermail/libre-soc-dev/2020-December/001443.html ``` Staf Verhaegen schreef op za Sat Dec 5 10:14:47 GMT 2020: > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton schreef op za 05-12-2020 om 06:11 [+0000]: > > On 12/5/20, Cole Poirier <colepoirier at gmail.com> wrote: > > I’d like to attempt to port Staf’s flexlib to the Skywater pdk > > 130nm gdsdesign rules. Is this eligible for funding from nlnet? > > if it is limited in scope to a maximum of 1 week, and around EUR > 500,and, critically, you in no way ask questions that you expect > eitherStaf or JP to answer (because they absolutely cannot), nor post > themwhere they could be distracted, *and* you also do not distract me > fromhelping them to do the core for the 180nm ASIC, then go for it. One of the reasons why I did not publicize too much about my flexlib repo is that I consider the code now pre-alpha. This means that I still plan to totally rework the API meaning lot's of frustration with people using current API without me having time to give proper support. From to other side I would love to have PDKMaster + FlexLib + FlexMem ported to Sky130. Although I would like to have part of the budget allocated to me so I can proper support. I propose to continue this discussion after the tape-out ? ``` Hi Staf, please do not feel the need to respond to this. I am raising this *deferred* bug report so that you and luke can continue the discussion *after* the tapeout.
This bug has been superseeded by bug #630. Unfortunately due to the unstable API and deadline stress it was not possible to support external contribution yet.