Bug 191 - NLNet 2019 Core Proposal 2019-02-012
Summary: NLNet 2019 Core Proposal 2019-02-012
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Libre-SOC's first SoC
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Milestones (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC Linux
: --- enhancement
Assignee: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
URL:
Depends on: 22 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2020-02-29 12:46 GMT by Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
Modified: 2020-12-02 20:14 GMT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
NLnet milestone: NLnet.2019.02
total budget (EUR) for completion of task and all subtasks: 50000
budget (EUR) for this task, excluding subtasks' budget: 0
parent task for budget allocation:
child tasks for budget allocation: 22 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 61 62 70 71 72 73 81
The table of payments (in EUR) for this task; TOML format:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton 2020-02-29 12:46:01 GMT
First proposal to NLNet, top-level
https://libre-riscv.org/nlnet_2018/
Comment 1 Jacob Lifshay 2020-03-01 02:59:30 GMT
Shouldn't this bug be set to depend on the sub-bugs rather than set to block the sub-bugs?
Comment 2 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton 2020-03-01 10:36:17 GMT
(In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #1)
> Shouldn't this bug be set to depend on the sub-bugs rather than set to block
> the sub-bugs?

yes. thanks :)
Comment 3 Jacob Lifshay 2020-03-01 18:40:18 GMT
added Kazan top-level bug to dependency list
Comment 4 Jacob Lifshay 2020-09-05 03:38:51 BST
As mentioned in bug 464, this task appears to have too many budgeting subtasks assigned to it since the total amount between subtasks is EUR 91500(!), assuming I calculated it correctly.

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464#c17
Comment 5 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton 2020-09-05 04:17:08 BST
(In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #4)
> As mentioned in bug 464, this task appears to have too many budgeting
> subtasks assigned to it since the total amount between subtasks is EUR
> 91500(!), assuming I calculated it correctly.

yes i will need to confirm with Michiel and Bob, the MoU is actually signed with over EUR 50,000
Comment 6 Cole Poirier 2020-12-02 19:51:47 GMT
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #5)

> yes i will need to confirm with Michiel and Bob, the MoU is actually signed
> with over EUR 50,000

Can you note the new total that was signed for this MoU here and link the message if possible? Then we can change the number from 50000 "total budget (EUR) for completion of task and all subtasks" to its correct value?
Comment 7 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton 2020-12-02 20:08:03 GMT
(In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #6)
> (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #5)

> (EUR) for completion of task and all subtasks" to it's correct value?

change it to it is value?

you must be intending to use the relative pronoun, "its".

i will edit your comment on your behalf.

i have not had a chance to speak with michiel yet.
Comment 8 Cole Poirier 2020-12-02 20:14:34 GMT
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #7)
> (In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #5)
> 
> > (EUR) for completion of task and all subtasks" to it's correct value?
> 
> change it to it is value?
> 
> you must be intending to use the relative pronoun, "its".
> 
> i will edit your comment on your behalf.
> 
> i have not had a chance to speak with michiel yet.

Yes, thank you. I'm usually pretty good at that, for some reason I stuffed it up today :)

Ah, I see, I seem to have only remembered the second half of your comment from comment #5 but not the first half which clearly states "yes i will need to confirm with Michiel and Bob". This resulted in my misunderstanding.

<https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=191#c5>
"yes i will need to confirm with Michiel and Bob, the MoU is actually signed with over EUR 50,000"